WebApr 12, 2024 · Abstract: Using a simple aggregation method from Stambaugh, Yu, and Yuan (2015) and Engelberg, McLean, and Pontiff (2024), major anomalies (i.e., momentum, … WebPapers that argue the opposite include McLean and Pontiff (2016); Engelberg, McLean and Pontiff (2024); Jacobs and Müller (2024); Chen and Zimmermann (2024); Jensen, Kelly and Pedersen (2024). 1. ... (2024)) and judgment that goes beyond multiple testing methods. I also do not examine whether predictability is stable over time or
EconPapers: Analysts and anomalies - Research Papers in …
Webpremium in panel regressions (Engelberg, McLean, and Pontiff, 2024). Days in which there is a spike in demand for information are associated with higher average returns, even … Webregressions similar to those in Engelberg, McLean, and Pontiff (2024). But, the results depend on the type of consumption. We do not find the . EIIC . triggered by own- firm scheduled announcements to be associated with a significant additional risk premium, after controlling for days inwhich . 2 byponsa
EconPapers: Analysts and anomalies - Research Papers in …
WebJoseph Engelberg . R. David McLean . and Jeffrey Pontiff . July 27, 2024 . Abstract . Using a sample of 97 stock return anomalies, we find that anomaly returns are 50% higher on corporate news days and 6 times higher on are earnings announcement days. These results could be explained by dynamic risk, mispricing via biased WebJoseph Engelberg R. David McLean and Jeffrey Pontiff February 2, 2024 Abstract Analysts’ price targets and recommendations contradict stock return anomaly variables. … WebJan 1, 2012 · Studies such as Linnainmaa and Roberts (2024), Mclean and Pontiff (2016), and Hou, Xue, and Zhang (2024) have shown that the performance of factor strategies tends to decline in the periods after ... clothes measures